linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.14 053/183] IB/cq: Dont force IB_POLL_DIRECT poll context for ib_process_cq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180425103244.681940698@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:34:33 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>,
        Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 053/183] IB/cq: Dont force IB_POLL_DIRECT poll context for ib_process_cq_direct

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>


[ Upstream commit 246d8b184c100e8eb6b4e8c88f232c2ed2a4e672 ]

polling the completion queue directly does not interfere
with the existing polling logic, hence drop the requirement.
Be aware that running ib_process_cq_direct with non IB_POLL_DIRECT
CQ may trigger concurrent CQ processing.

This can be used for polling mode ULPs.

Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>
Reported-by: Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
[maxg: added wcs array argument to __ib_process_cq]
Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/infiniband/core/cq.c |   23 +++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cq.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cq.c
@@ -25,9 +25,10 @@
 #define IB_POLL_FLAGS \
 	(IB_CQ_NEXT_COMP | IB_CQ_REPORT_MISSED_EVENTS)
 
-static int __ib_process_cq(struct ib_cq *cq, int budget)
+static int __ib_process_cq(struct ib_cq *cq, int budget, struct ib_wc *poll_wc)
 {
 	int i, n, completed = 0;
+	struct ib_wc *wcs = poll_wc ? : cq->wc;
 
 	/*
 	 * budget might be (-1) if the caller does not
@@ -35,9 +36,9 @@ static int __ib_process_cq(struct ib_cq
 	 * minimum here.
 	 */
 	while ((n = ib_poll_cq(cq, min_t(u32, IB_POLL_BATCH,
-			budget - completed), cq->wc)) > 0) {
+			budget - completed), wcs)) > 0) {
 		for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
-			struct ib_wc *wc = &cq->wc[i];
+			struct ib_wc *wc = &wcs[i];
 
 			if (wc->wr_cqe)
 				wc->wr_cqe->done(cq, wc);
@@ -60,18 +61,20 @@ static int __ib_process_cq(struct ib_cq
  * @cq:		CQ to process
  * @budget:	number of CQEs to poll for
  *
- * This function is used to process all outstanding CQ entries on a
- * %IB_POLL_DIRECT CQ.  It does not offload CQ processing to a different
- * context and does not ask for completion interrupts from the HCA.
+ * This function is used to process all outstanding CQ entries.
+ * It does not offload CQ processing to a different context and does
+ * not ask for completion interrupts from the HCA.
+ * Using direct processing on CQ with non IB_POLL_DIRECT type may trigger
+ * concurrent processing.
  *
  * Note: do not pass -1 as %budget unless it is guaranteed that the number
  * of completions that will be processed is small.
  */
 int ib_process_cq_direct(struct ib_cq *cq, int budget)
 {
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(cq->poll_ctx != IB_POLL_DIRECT);
+	struct ib_wc wcs[IB_POLL_BATCH];
 
-	return __ib_process_cq(cq, budget);
+	return __ib_process_cq(cq, budget, wcs);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ib_process_cq_direct);
 
@@ -85,7 +88,7 @@ static int ib_poll_handler(struct irq_po
 	struct ib_cq *cq = container_of(iop, struct ib_cq, iop);
 	int completed;
 
-	completed = __ib_process_cq(cq, budget);
+	completed = __ib_process_cq(cq, budget, NULL);
 	if (completed < budget) {
 		irq_poll_complete(&cq->iop);
 		if (ib_req_notify_cq(cq, IB_POLL_FLAGS) > 0)
@@ -105,7 +108,7 @@ static void ib_cq_poll_work(struct work_
 	struct ib_cq *cq = container_of(work, struct ib_cq, work);
 	int completed;
 
-	completed = __ib_process_cq(cq, IB_POLL_BUDGET_WORKQUEUE);
+	completed = __ib_process_cq(cq, IB_POLL_BUDGET_WORKQUEUE, NULL);
 	if (completed >= IB_POLL_BUDGET_WORKQUEUE ||
 	    ib_req_notify_cq(cq, IB_POLL_FLAGS) > 0)
 		queue_work(ib_comp_wq, &cq->work);