linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] soc: qcom: smem: bug fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fa630ea3-ec6e-76ee-a677-198c26b7fb49@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 25 Apr 2018 06:37:02 -0500
From:   Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
To:     Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>
Cc:     clew@...eaurora.org, aneela@...eaurora.org, david.brown@...aro.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] soc: qcom: smem: bug fixes

On 04/24/2018 11:07 PM, Andy Gross wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 07:11:41AM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
>> On 04/10/2018 05:25 PM, Alex Elder wrote:
>>> This series contains mostly bug fixes to the Qualcomm shared memory
>>> ("smem") code.  Although the bugs are real, they have most likely
>>> never been observed.
>>>
>>> 					-Alex
>>
>> Ping?	-Alex
> 
> It's only been a couple of weeks =P  That said, I looked over all of these and
> they look reasonable.  I'd like Bjorn to take a look as well.

Thanks a lot.  I have another set of patches based on these and I've been
sitting on them.  I don't want to inundate the list.

I see Bjorn has given his OK on all of them (thanks Bjorn!), so I'll send
out my new ones today.

					-Alex

> Andy
>