linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] p9caps: add Plan9 capability devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3634890.Egg3N7Xbv6@blindfold>
Date:   Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:23:34 +0200
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard@...ma-star.at>
To:     Enrico Weigelt <lkml@...ux.net>,
        "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <metux@....de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] p9caps: add Plan9 capability devices

Am Mittwoch, 25. April 2018, 12:38:02 CEST schrieb Enrico Weigelt:
> >> +       list_for_each_safe(pos, q, &(caphash_writers)) {
> >> +               tmp = list_entry(pos, struct caphash_entry, list);
> > 
> > list_for_each_entry.
> 
> what's the exact difference ?

Whoops, I meant list_for_each_entry_safe().
You don't list_entry() then.

Thanks,
//richard

-- 
sigma star gmbh - Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 6 - 6020 Innsbruck - Austria
ATU66964118 - FN 374287y