[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180425123915.twp3m73o5xap3m6j@flea>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:39:15 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc: devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] ARM: dts: sun8i: h3: Split out common board design
for ALL-H3-CC
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:19:20AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 3:37 AM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:17:11PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 8:13 PM, Maxime Ripard
> >> <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 07:34:19PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >> >> The Libre Computer Project ALL-H3-CC has three models, all using the
> >> >> same board design, but with different pin compatible SoCs and amount of
> >> >> DRAM.
> >> >>
> >> >> Currently only the H3 1GB DRAM variant is supported. To support the two
> >> >> other variants, first split the original device tree into a common board
> >> >> design part and an SoC specific part.
> >> >>
> >> >> The SoC part only defines which SoC is used and model name, and includes
> >> >> the SoC specific dtsi file and the common design dtsi file.
> >> >>
> >> >> Also fix up the SPDX identifier line to use the correct comment style,
> >> >> and place it on the first line.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> .../boot/dts/sun8i-h3-libretech-all-h3-cc.dts | 213 +-----------------
> >> >> ....dts => sunxi-hx-libretech-all-h3-cc.dtsi} | 11 +-
> >> >
> >> > I think I prefer the name of Neil's DTSI better, and since pretty much
> >> > the same patches (a couple of hours) before, we'll merge them (while
> >> > merging the rest of your patches, obviously).
> >> >
> >> > Does that work for you?
> >>
> >> I would like for the regulator voltage fix to be merged before the split.
> >> This will make it trivial to back port, instead of having to reverse the
> >> split, and maybe failing.
> >
> > Yes, I was just talking about replacing your two redundant patches,
> > but keeping the order you have.
>
> That works for me. Might require a little fixing up.
> Let me know if you need help with that.
I did. You can double check if you want :)
maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists