[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1804251502310.2082@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:03:13 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, Genki Sky <sky@...ki.is>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT patch 0/7] timekeeping: Unify clock MONOTONIC and clock
BOOTTIME
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 25, 2018 10:52:18 AM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 10:09:28 AM CEST Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Mon, 23 Apr 2018, John Stultz wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 7:45 PM, Genki Sky <sky@...ki.is> wrote:
> > > > > Quoting Genki Sky (2018/04/23 20:40:36 -0400)
> > > > >> I came across this thread for same reason as [0]: Daemons getting
> > > > >> killed by systemd on resume (after >WatchdogSec seconds of
> > > > >> suspending). I'm using master branch of systemd and the kernel. As
> > > > >> mentioned, systemd uses CLOCK_MONOTONIC, originally expecting it to
> > > > >> not include suspend time.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Correct me if I'm mistaken, but I don't see the ambiguity of whether
> > > > >> this patch series breaks systemd. If it's implemented correctly, you'd
> > > > >> hope it *would* break it!
> > > > >
> > > > > This sounded a little weak on re-reading, sorry. So, I just confirmed
> > > > > that after booting a "git revert -m 1 680014d6d1da", the issue no
> > > > > longer appears. (I.e., a suspend for >WatchDog sec doesn't result in
> > > > > any daemon getting killed).
> > > > >
> > > > > Let me know if I can help in any way.
> > > >
> > > > Yea, this is the sort of thing I was worried about.
> > > >
> > > > Thomas: I think reverting this change is needed.
> > >
> > > Sigh. I hoped that something like this would be catched before I sent the
> > > pull request by those who were actually interested in this change...
> >
> > The "git revert -m 1 680014d6d1da" makes resume issues on my Aspire S5
> > go away (cf. https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=152460804018920&w=2).
> >
> > I'll try with just the "monotonic" vs "boottime" clock changes reverted.
>
> FWICS (so far) system resume still works here with the commits between
> d6ed449afdb3 (timekeeping: Make the MONOTONIC clock behave like the BOOTTIME
> clock) and 127bfa5f4342 (hrtimer: Unify MONOTONIC and BOOTTIME clock behavior)
> inclusive reverted on top of 4.17-rc2. [I probably should revert commit
> 92af4dcb4e1c (tracing: Unify the "boot" and "mono" tracing clocks) too, but
> it doesn't revert cleanly and it doesn't apprear to affect things here too.]
Right, it does not matter. The real interesting one is d6ed449afdb3.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists