[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <42858ef4-c1b8-c83e-4b47-39e28e161e16@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 21:04:52 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 5/5] f2fs: enforce fsync_mode=strict for
renamed directory
On 2018/4/25 13:46, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> This is to give a option for user to be able to recover B/foo in the below
> case.
>
> mkdir A
> sync()
> rename(A, B)
> creat (B/foo)
> fsync (B/foo)
> ---crash---
That makes sense, IMO, it will be better to cover cross rename case as well?
Thanks,
>
> Sugessted-by: Velayudhan Pillai <vijay@...utexas.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/namei.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/namei.c b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> index b5f404674cad..fef6e3ab2135 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> @@ -973,8 +973,11 @@ static int f2fs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
> f2fs_put_page(old_dir_page, 0);
> f2fs_i_links_write(old_dir, false);
> }
> - if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).fsync_mode == FSYNC_MODE_STRICT)
> + if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).fsync_mode == FSYNC_MODE_STRICT) {
> add_ino_entry(sbi, new_dir->i_ino, TRANS_DIR_INO);
> + if (S_ISDIR(old_inode->i_mode))
> + add_ino_entry(sbi, old_inode->i_ino, TRANS_DIR_INO);
> + }
>
> f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists