[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1804262148420.1596@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 21:50:51 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
cc: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] genirq/msi: Limit level-triggered MSI to platform
devices
On Mon, 23 Apr 2018, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Nobody would be insane enough to try and use level triggered
> MSIs on PCI, but let's make sure it doesn't happen. Also,
> let's mandate that the irqchip backing the platform MSI domain
> is providing an irq_set_type method (or the whole thing would
> be a bit useless).
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
> ---
> drivers/base/platform-msi.c | 3 +++
> drivers/pci/msi.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform-msi.c b/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> index 8e22073aeeed..3b9694a6beaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> @@ -101,6 +101,9 @@ static void platform_msi_update_chip_ops(struct msi_domain_info *info)
> chip->irq_set_affinity = msi_domain_set_affinity;
> if (!chip->irq_write_msi_msg)
> chip->irq_write_msi_msg = platform_msi_write_msg;
> + if (WARN_ON((info->flags & MSI_FLAG_LEVEL_CAPABLE) &&
> + !chip->irq_set_type))
Shouldn't we just require something like IRQCHIP_SUPPORTS_MSI_LEVEL or such
in chip->flags being set instead?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists