lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1804262148420.1596@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Thu, 26 Apr 2018 21:50:51 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
cc:     Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] genirq/msi: Limit level-triggered MSI to platform
 devices

On Mon, 23 Apr 2018, Marc Zyngier wrote:

> Nobody would be insane enough to try and use level triggered
> MSIs on PCI, but let's make sure it doesn't happen. Also,
> let's mandate that the irqchip backing the platform MSI domain
> is providing an irq_set_type method (or the whole thing would
> be a bit useless).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/base/platform-msi.c | 3 +++
>  drivers/pci/msi.c           | 3 +++
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform-msi.c b/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> index 8e22073aeeed..3b9694a6beaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/platform-msi.c
> @@ -101,6 +101,9 @@ static void platform_msi_update_chip_ops(struct msi_domain_info *info)
>  		chip->irq_set_affinity = msi_domain_set_affinity;
>  	if (!chip->irq_write_msi_msg)
>  		chip->irq_write_msi_msg = platform_msi_write_msg;
> +	if (WARN_ON((info->flags & MSI_FLAG_LEVEL_CAPABLE) &&
> +		    !chip->irq_set_type))

Shouldn't we just require something like IRQCHIP_SUPPORTS_MSI_LEVEL or such
in chip->flags being set instead?

Thanks,

	tglx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ