[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180426210357.GF5965@thunk.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:03:57 -0400
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: jannh@...gle.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: random: GFP_KERNEL from irq context
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:28:13AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> during boot. We end up doing the numa_crng_init() from interrupt context, which
> makes things unhappy since you do GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL allocations from
> there.
I've already sent a pull request to Linux to fix this; see the
random.git tree.
Apologies for not noticing this earlier. My test environment had
virtio-rng enabled by default, and while I did test the CONFIG_NUMA
case, the call to add randomness doesn't happen from interrupt context
with virtio-rng so I missed it in my testing.
Cheers,
- Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists