linux-kernel - Re: [patch V2 1/7] LICENSES/GPL2.0: Add GPL-2.0-only/or-later as valid identifiers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180426070040.GF14025@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Apr 2018 09:00:40 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 1/7] LICENSES/GPL2.0: Add GPL-2.0-only/or-later as
 valid identifiers

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:30:21PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner tglx@...utronix.de
> 
> Quite some files have been flagged with the new GPL-2.0-only and
> GPL-2.0-or-later identifiers which replace the original GPL-2.0 and
> GPL-2.0+ identifiers in the SPDX license identifier specification, but the
> identifiers are not mentioned as valid in the GPL-2.0 license file.
> 
> Add them to the license file and to the Linux-syscall-note exception to
> make everything consistent again.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>
> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>

I think you dropped my review of the v1 of this series :(

Anyway:

Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>