[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1937172.K7anUBJQAz@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 10:00:22 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@...roid.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Kevin Easton <kevin@...rana.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
SergeySenozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: [tip:timers/urgent] Revert: Unify CLOCK_MONOTONIC and CLOCK_BOOTTIME
On Wednesday, April 25, 2018 11:28:27 PM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 25, 2018 9:09:29 PM CEST Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 6:45 AM, tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
> > > <tipbot@...or.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > As stated in the pull request for the unification of CLOCK_MONOTONIC and
> > > > CLOCK_BOOTTIME, it was clear that we might have to revert the change.
> > >
> > > I'm ok with the revert., but I do want the revert message to talk
> > > about *exactly* what broke.
> > >
> > > I don't see the reported watchdog things, and I run systemd and I ran
> > > these patches.
> >
> > With suspend/resume?
> >
> > > So it's not just "systemd uses this for a watchdog". It must be
> > > something specific that made it trigger for some people and not
> > > others, and it's that specific thing that we should document so that
> > > we know why this simplification failed.
> >
> > Fair enough. Do the reporters have more information or do I have to chase
> > it down myself?
>
> Well, if CLOCK_MONOTONIC did not count when the system was suspended and now
> it does that due to the change in question, then this is a significant
> difference in behavior likely to confuse things even in principle.
FWIW, here's a list of issues reported and narrowed down to the commit
in question so far I could find:
* systemd kills daemons on resume, after >WatchdogSec seconds
of suspending (Genki Sky). [Verified that that's because systemd uses
CLOCK_MONOTONIC and expects it to not include the suspend time.]
* systemd-journald misbehaves after resume:
systemd-journald[7266]: File /var/log/journal/016627c3c4784cd4812d4b7e96a34226/system.journal corrupted or uncleanly shut down, renaming and replacing.
( Mike Galbraith).
* NetworkManager reports "networking disabled" and networking is broken
after resume 50% of the time (Pavel). [May be because of systemd.]
* MATE desktop dims the display and starts the screensaver right after
system resume (Pavel).
* Full system hang during resume (me). [May be due to systemd or NM or both.]
I'm not sure if all of the above can be connected to one specific thing (other
than the fact that things get confused if they expect CLOCK_MONOTONIC to not
include system suspend time).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists