lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20180426105313.792db06a@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 10:53:13 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the bpf tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:
samples/sockmap/Makefile
between commit:
4dfe1bb95235 ("bpf: sockmap sample use clang flag, -target bpf")
from the bpf tree and commit:
2e04eb1dd1ca ("bpf: sockmap, remove samples program")
from the bpf-next tree.
I fixed it up (I just removed the file) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists