lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180426103304.GA4639@infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 26 Apr 2018 03:33:04 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     dsterba@...e.cz, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: use #pragma once

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 12:26:29PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> There are about 20k header files, none of them has #pragma once.
> Updating that will bring many unnesessry git commits.
> 
> I doubt that one more define in preprocessor tables is a problem we
> should fix. The LOC argument also does not sound very convincing. The
> include protection is at the top of the file, not mixed among other
> code. Replacing 2-3 lines with one will be barely noticeable.

Let's put it another way:  does this make any noticable difference
for compile times?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ