[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e8704374-857c-d80e-e91c-89d59e1cffbe@siemens.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:00:30 +0200
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
To: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Tull <atull@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] of: overlay: Stop leaking resources on overlay removal
Only the overlay notifier callbacks have a chance to potentially get
hold of references to those two resources, but they are not supposed to
store them beyond OF_OVERLAY_POST_REMOVE.
Document the overlay notifier API, its constraint regarding pointer
lifetime, and then remove intentional leaks of ovcs->overlay_tree and
ovcs->fdt from free_overlay_changeset.
See also https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/23/1063 and following.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.txt | 8 ++++++++
drivers/of/overlay.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.txt
index a4feb6dde8cd..725fb8d255c1 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.txt
@@ -98,6 +98,14 @@ Finally, if you need to remove all overlays in one-go, just call
of_overlay_remove_all() which will remove every single one in the correct
order.
+In addition, there is the option to register notifiers that get called on
+overlay operations. See of_overlay_notifier_register/unregister and
+enum of_overlay_notify_action for details.
+
+Note that a notifier callback is not supposed to store pointers to a device
+tree node or its content beyond OF_OVERLAY_POST_REMOVE corresponding to the
+respective node it received.
+
Overlay DTS Format
------------------
diff --git a/drivers/of/overlay.c b/drivers/of/overlay.c
index b35fe88f1851..7baa53e5b1d7 100644
--- a/drivers/of/overlay.c
+++ b/drivers/of/overlay.c
@@ -102,12 +102,28 @@ static DEFINE_IDR(ovcs_idr);
static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(overlay_notify_chain);
+/**
+ * of_overlay_notifier_register() - Register notifier for overlay operations
+ * @nb: Notifier block to register
+ *
+ * Register for notification on overlay operations on device tree nodes. The
+ * reported actions definied by @of_reconfig_change. The notifier callback
+ * furthermore receives a pointer to the affected device tree node.
+ *
+ * Note that a notifier callback is not supposed to store pointers to a device
+ * tree node or its content beyond @OF_OVERLAY_POST_REMOVE corresponding to the
+ * respective node it received.
+ */
int of_overlay_notifier_register(struct notifier_block *nb)
{
return blocking_notifier_chain_register(&overlay_notify_chain, nb);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_overlay_notifier_register);
+/**
+ * of_overlay_notifier_register() - Unregister notifier for overlay operations
+ * @nb: Notifier block to unregister
+ */
int of_overlay_notifier_unregister(struct notifier_block *nb)
{
return blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&overlay_notify_chain, nb);
@@ -671,17 +687,13 @@ static void free_overlay_changeset(struct overlay_changeset *ovcs)
of_node_put(ovcs->fragments[i].overlay);
}
kfree(ovcs->fragments);
-
/*
- * TODO
- *
- * would like to: kfree(ovcs->overlay_tree);
- * but can not since drivers may have pointers into this data
- *
- * would like to: kfree(ovcs->fdt);
- * but can not since drivers may have pointers into this data
+ * There should be no live pointers into ovcs->overlay_tree and
+ * ovcs->fdt due to the policy that overlay notifiers are not allowed
+ * to retain pointers into the overlay devicetree.
*/
-
+ kfree(ovcs->overlay_tree);
+ kfree(ovcs->fdt);
kfree(ovcs);
}
--
2.13.6
Powered by blists - more mailing lists