[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <98b50ae7-b889-6811-476e-9cdc8a62a484@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 18:40:46 +0700
From: Lars Melin <larsm17@...il.com>
To: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: SZ Lin (林上智) <sz.lin@...a.com>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: serial: option: adding support for ublox R410M
On 4/26/2018 18:39, Lars Melin wrote:
> On 4/26/2018 18:19, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>> Anyway, Qualcomm based designs are definitely handled by both drivers.
>> Using qcserial only makes sense if the interface layout matches one of
>> the defined shared schemes, which currently are:
>>
>> QCSERIAL_G2K = 0, /* Gobi 2000 */
>> QCSERIAL_G1K = 1, /* Gobi 1000 */
>> QCSERIAL_SWI = 2, /* Sierra Wireless */
>> QCSERIAL_HWI = 3, /* Huawei */
>
> It seems to me that this Quectel device matches the interface layout for
> Gobi1K:
>
> * Gobi 1K USB layout:
> * 0: DM/DIAG (use libqcdm from ModemManager for communication)
> * 1: serial port (doesn't respond)
> * 2: AT-capable modem port
> * 3: QMI/net
> */
>
> /Lars
Ublox, not Quectel..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists