lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2c255e56c8e8c64cd31d30dba975c7c2ff580b89.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:51:45 +0300
From:   Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Haim Dreyfuss <haim.dreyfuss@...el.com>,
        Shaul Triebitz <shaul.triebitz@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with
 the wireless-drivers tree

On Thu, 2018-04-26 at 13:33 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, 2018-04-26 at 11:09 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree got a
> > > conflict in:
> > > 
> > >   drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-nvm-parse.c
> > > 
> > > between commit:
> > > 
> > >   77e30e10ee28 ("iwlwifi: mvm: query regdb for wmm rule if
> > > needed")
> > > 
> > > from the wireless-drivers tree and commits:
> > > 
> > >   9c4f7d512740 ("iwlwifi: move all NVM parsing code to the common
> > > files")
> > >   4c625c564ba2 ("iwlwifi: get rid of fw/nvm.c")
> > > 
> > > from the wireless-drivers-next tree.
> > > 
> > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> > > This
> > > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non
> > > trivial
> > > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when
> > > your
> > > tree
> > > is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> > > cooperating
> > > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> > > particularly
> > > complex conflicts.
> > 
> > Thanks for resolving this, Stephen!
> > 
> > I checked your resolution and it's spot on.
> 
> I now merged w-d to w-d-next to fix this, please check:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/wireless-driver
> s-next.git/commit/?id=0ddcf3e76ae4d02918e609342a1020b50258fadd
> 
> I was not sure what to do with these includes so I left them in:
> 
> #include "fw/api/commands.h"
> #include "fw/api/cmdhdr.h"
> #include "fw/img.h"

That's fine, these are all in our internal tree too.

Thanks!

--
Cheers,
Luca.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ