linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "x86/mm: implement free pmd/pte page interfaces"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:31:37 +0200
From:   Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, hpa@...or.com,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "x86/mm: implement free pmd/pte page interfaces"

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 05:27:12PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> <formletter>
> 
> This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
> stable kernel tree.  Please read:
>     https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
> for how to do this properly.
> 
> </formletter>

That is fine, as this is an upstream-first submission. When this commit
gets accepted it can also be applied to stable, given the original
commit was applied there too (didn't check that).

I just cc'ed stable because it was cc'ed on the original patch.


Thanks,

	Joerg