[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180427205621.GE23874@flask>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 22:56:22 +0200
From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, y2038@...ts.linaro.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jailhouse-dev@...glegroups.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v3] x86: Convert x86_platform_ops to timespec64
2018-04-27 22:13+0200, Arnd Bergmann:
> The x86 platform operations are fairly isolated, so we can
> change them from using timespec to timespec64. I checked that
> All the users and callers are safe, and there is only one
> critical function that is broken beyond 2106:
>
> pvclock_read_wallclock() uses a 32-bit number of seconds since
> the epoch to communicate the boot time between host and guest
> in a virtual environment. This will work until 2106, but we
> should ideally find a replacement anyway. I've added a comment
> about it there.
>
> Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> v2 changes:
> - move comment block (Boris)
> - remove unnecessary type cast (Boris)
> - fix format string (0day bot)
> - fix include order (0day bot)
>
> v3 changes:
> - add jailhouse specific change
> - avoid include file header by relying on another
> patch ("timekeeping: Remove timespec64 hack")
>
> Not sure how we want to merge this (assuming the last modification
> worked, this has seen little testing). The "timekeeping: Remove
> timespec64 hack" patch should go through the timekeeping branch
> in tip, while this one is for x86. I assume the linux-tip maintainers
> can come up with a plan.
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h
> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ void pvclock_set_flags(u8 flags);
> unsigned long pvclock_tsc_khz(struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src);
> void pvclock_read_wallclock(struct pvclock_wall_clock *wall,
> struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *vcpu,
> - struct timespec *ts);
> + struct timespec64 *ts);
> void pvclock_resume(void);
>
> void pvclock_touch_watchdogs(void);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static struct pvclock_wall_clock *wall_clock;
> * have elapsed since the hypervisor wrote the data. So we try to account for
> * that with system time
> */
> -static void kvm_get_wallclock(struct timespec *now)
> +static void kvm_get_wallclock(struct timespec64 *now)
> {
> struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *vcpu_time;
> int low, high;
> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static void kvm_get_wallclock(struct timespec *now)
> put_cpu();
> }
>
> -static int kvm_set_wallclock(const struct timespec *now)
> +static int kvm_set_wallclock(const struct timespec64 *now)
> {
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c
> @@ -123,28 +123,35 @@ u64 pvclock_clocksource_read(struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src)
>
> void pvclock_read_wallclock(struct pvclock_wall_clock *wall_clock,
> struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *vcpu_time,
> - struct timespec *ts)
> + struct timespec64 *ts)
> {
> u32 version;
> u64 delta;
> - struct timespec now;
> + struct timespec64 now;
>
> /* get wallclock at system boot */
> do {
> version = wall_clock->version;
> rmb(); /* fetch version before time */
> + /*
> + * Note: wall_clock->sec is a u32 value, so it can
> + * only store dates between 1970 and 2106. To allow
> + * times beyond that, we need to create a new hypercall
> + * interface with an extended pvclock_wall_clock structure
> + * like ARM has.
> + */
(Modern TSC extensions stripped pvclock of all advantages, so we'll
likely abandon pvclock by then.)
> now.tv_sec = wall_clock->sec;
> now.tv_nsec = wall_clock->nsec;
> rmb(); /* fetch time before checking version */
> } while ((wall_clock->version & 1) || (version != wall_clock->version));
>
> delta = pvclock_clocksource_read(vcpu_time); /* time since system boot */
> - delta += now.tv_sec * (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC + now.tv_nsec;
> + delta += now.tv_sec * NSEC_PER_SEC + now.tv_nsec;
>
> now.tv_nsec = do_div(delta, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> now.tv_sec = delta;
>
> - set_normalized_timespec(ts, now.tv_sec, now.tv_nsec);
> + set_normalized_timespec64(ts, now.tv_sec, now.tv_nsec);
> }
>
> void pvclock_set_pvti_cpu0_va(struct pvclock_vsyscall_time_info *pvti)
kvmclock and pvclock changes
Acked-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists