linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.16 78/81] s390/uprobes: implement arch_uretprobe_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 27 Apr 2018 15:59:20 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Ziqian SUN <zsun@...hat.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.16 78/81] s390/uprobes: implement arch_uretprobe_is_alive()

4.16-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>

commit 783c3b53b9506db3e05daacfe34e0287eebb09d8 upstream.

Implement s390 specific arch_uretprobe_is_alive() to avoid SIGSEGVs
observed with uretprobes in combination with setjmp/longjmp.

See commit 2dea1d9c38e4 ("powerpc/uprobes: Implement
arch_uretprobe_is_alive()") for more details.

With this implemented all test cases referenced in the above commit
pass.

Reported-by: Ziqian SUN <zsun@...hat.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v4.3+
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/s390/kernel/uprobes.c |    9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

--- a/arch/s390/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -150,6 +150,15 @@ unsigned long arch_uretprobe_hijack_retu
 	return orig;
 }
 
+bool arch_uretprobe_is_alive(struct return_instance *ret, enum rp_check ctx,
+			     struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	if (ctx == RP_CHECK_CHAIN_CALL)
+		return user_stack_pointer(regs) <= ret->stack;
+	else
+		return user_stack_pointer(regs) < ret->stack;
+}
+
 /* Instruction Emulation */
 
 static void adjust_psw_addr(psw_t *psw, unsigned long len)