[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180427135711.508604985@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 15:58:28 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 38/74] s390: Replace IS_ENABLED(EXPOLINE_*) with IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EXPOLINE_*)
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
From: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>
[ Upstream commit 2cb370d615e9fbed9e95ed222c2c8f337181aa90 ]
I've accidentally stumbled upon the IS_ENABLED(EXPOLINE_*) lines, which
obviously always evaluate to false. Fix this.
Fixes: f19fbd5ed642 ("s390: introduce execute-trampolines for branches")
Signed-off-by: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/s390/kernel/nospec-branch.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/nospec-branch.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/nospec-branch.c
@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@
#include <asm/facility.h>
#include <asm/nospec-branch.h>
-int nospec_call_disable = IS_ENABLED(EXPOLINE_OFF);
-int nospec_return_disable = !IS_ENABLED(EXPOLINE_FULL);
+int nospec_call_disable = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EXPOLINE_OFF);
+int nospec_return_disable = !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EXPOLINE_FULL);
static int __init nospectre_v2_setup_early(char *str)
{
Powered by blists - more mailing lists