[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180428043547.GA27835@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 06:35:47 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.18 00/24] 3.18.107-stable review
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 03:41:28PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 03:57:35PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.18.107 release.
>
> The kernel.org page currently lists 3.18 as EOL. I assume we released
> an update for Spectre/Meltdown after we declared it end of life, but I
> was surprised to see that there was going to be a 3.18.107.
There are no patches for Spectre/Meltdown in the 3.18.y kernel tree that
I know of.
> Should we change how 3.18 is listed on kernel.org? Or should we just
> keep peeople wondering whether will be updates after 3.18.107? :-)
Keep people wondering.
As I have stated before, I'm keeping it alive as there are still a few
tens of millions of devices out there using this kernel, including one
of my personal phones. I might get tired of keeping it semi-up-to-date
and then will stop releasing updates, and reserve the right to do so at
any point in time :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists