[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180428055021.GA31162@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 07:50:21 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
"Hao, Shun" <shun.hao@...el.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 41/80] Revert "microblaze: fix endian handling"
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 09:25:24AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 03:58:34PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> >
> > This reverts commit ac3d021048be9edb825f0794da5b42f04fefecef which is
> > commit 71e7673dadfdae0605d4c1f66ecb4b045c79fe0f upstream.
> >
> > kbuild reports that this causes build regressions in 4.14.y, so drop it.
> >
>
> I don't know about kbuild, but with this revert applied all Microblaze
> builds fail. There are endless
>
> warning: #warning inconsistent configuration, needs CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN [-Wcpp]
>
> followed by
>
> lib/find_bit.c:185:15: error: redefinition of ‘find_next_bit_le’
>
> I have to revert this revert to get successful builds.
Sorry about that, yes, you are right, it needs to be dropped, and I've
now done so and pushed out a -rc2 with that fixed up.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists