[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180428060141.GC18371@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 08:01:41 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Efstratios Gavas <xtrat@....io>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Thibaut SAUTEREAU <thibaut.sautereau@...ecom-sudparis.eu>,
Christopher H Pezley <chris@...ley.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
AbdAllah-MEZITI <abdallah.meziti.pro@...il.com>,
Aviya Erenfeld <aviyae42@...il.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Aviv Palivoda <palaviv@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] staging: wlan-ng: prism2sta: fixed indent coding style
issues.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 09:33:34PM +0000, Efstratios Gavas wrote:
> Fixed format/style issues found with checkpatch. No code changes.
> Corrected alignment of variables after open parenthesis and line breaks.
> Checkpatch now returns clean except for line over 80 char warnings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Efstratios Gavas <xtrat@....io>
> ---
> v2(unlabled): changed title info
> v3: improved changlog description
> ---
> drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2sta.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
Why was this sent twice? Which one should I take?
I'm dropping both, please only send 1 patch next time.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists