lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9r5XNS_AU234vKbt9PoHGN3PooFSA8EqNfDRpBHREdQAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Apr 2018 00:43:48 +0200
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     Sultan Alsawaf <sultanxda@...il.com>
Cc:     "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Linux messages full of `random: get_random_u32 called from`

> -       if ((fast_pool->count < 64) &&
> -           !time_after(now, fast_pool->last + HZ))
> -               return;
> -

I suspect you still want the rate-limiting in place. But if you _do_
want to cheat like this, you could instead just modify the condition
to only relax the rate limiting when !crng_init().

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ