[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180430212719.GF1124@mail-itl>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 23:27:19 +0200
From: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
<marmarek@...isiblethingslab.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] xen: Add RING_COPY_RESPONSE()
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 05:25:52PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Also, perhaps the two can be collapsed together, along the lines of
>
> #define RING_COPY_(action, _r, _idx, _msg) do { \
> /* Use volatile to force the copy into _msg. */ \
> *(_msg) = *(volatile typeof(_msg))RING_GET_##action(_r, _idx); \
> } while (0)
>
> #define RING_COPY_REQUEST(_r, _idx, _req) RING_COPY_(REQUEST, _r, _idx,
> _req)
> #define RING_COPY_RESPONSE(_r, _idx, _rsp) RING_COPY_(RESPONSE, _r,
> _idx, _rsp)
>
>
> (I have not tried to compile this so it may well be wrong)
It works, thanks :)
I'll wait with v2 until I get feedback on other patches.
--
Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists