[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkday+d9iGeX+CRHTEyC=w+oNUK-8oTy0HqugO5PRhHn62w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 11:03:25 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Hoan Tran <hotran@....com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/61] gpio: simplify getting .drvdata
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 5:14 PM, Grygorii Strashko
<grygorii.strashko@...com> wrote:
> On 04/19/2018 09:05 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>
>> We should get drvdata from struct device directly. Going via
>> platform_device is an unneeded step back and forth.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Build tested only. buildbot is happy. Please apply individually.
>
>
> for gpio-omap.c:
> Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Hm I only see the responses not the actual patch, I guess I will find it
sooner or later.
Wolfram: if I don't find it, poke me with something sharp so I get to apply it.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists