[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180430090542.GD6509@pd.tnic>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 11:05:42 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] x86/microcode/AMD: Check the equivalence table
size when scanning it
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:34:11PM +0200, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> Currently, the code scanning the CPU equivalence table read from a
> microcode container file assumes that it actually contains a terminating
> zero entry.
> Let's check also the size of this table to make sure that we don't read
> past it in case it actually doesn't.
...
> @@ -697,6 +706,7 @@ static unsigned int install_equiv_cpu_table(const u8 *buf, size_t buf_size)
> }
>
> memcpy(equiv_cpu_table, buf + CONTAINER_HDR_SZ, equiv_tbl_len);
> + equiv_cpu_table_entries = equiv_tbl_len / sizeof(struct equiv_cpu_entry);
>
> return equiv_tbl_len;
Instead of adding yet another global var which needs handling too,
and touching so many places, just do all checks and preparations in
install_equiv_cpu_table() so that the rest of the code can get what it
expects: terminating zero entry and proper size.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists