[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180430102720.D5FC760710@smtp.codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 10:27:20 +0000 (UTC)
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Cc: Larry.Finger@...inger.net, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
b43-dev@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Subject: Re: net: wireless: b43legacy: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in
dma_tx_fragment
Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com> wrote:
> dma_tx_fragment() is never called in atomic context.
>
> dma_tx_fragment() is only called by b43legacy_dma_tx(), which is
> only called by b43legacy_tx_work().
> b43legacy_tx_work() is only set a parameter of INIT_WORK() in
> b43legacy_wireless_init().
>
> Despite never getting called from atomic context,
> dma_tx_fragment() calls alloc_skb() with GFP_ATOMIC,
> which does not sleep for allocation.
> GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary and can be replaced with GFP_KERNEL,
> which can sleep and improve the possibility of sucessful allocation.
>
> This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
> And I also manually check it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks.
6e1d8d1470b2 net: wireless: b43legacy: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in dma_tx_fragment
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10333217/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists