[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a176ae33-eb01-d275-f372-a33829e865a7@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 08:30:43 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linuxram@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mpe@...erman.id.au,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, shakeelb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] [v3] x86, pkeys: two protection keys bug fixes
On 04/28/2018 12:05 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> In the above kernel that was missing the PROT_EXEC fix I was repeatedly running
> the 64-bit and 32-bit testcases as non-root and as root as well, until I got a
> hang in the middle of a 32-bit test running as root:
>
> test 7 PASSED (iteration 19)
> test 8 PASSED (iteration 19)
> test 9 PASSED (iteration 19)
>
> < test just hangs here >
For the hang, there is a known issue with the use of printf() in the
signal handler and a resulting deadlock. I *thought* there was a patch
merged to fix this from Ram Pai or one of the other IBM folks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists