[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180430165704.bkce56nzx3giodbd@MacBook-Pro-de-Roger.local>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 17:57:04 +0100
From: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
<jgross@...e.com>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] xen/PVH: Replace GDT_ENTRY with explicit
constant
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 12:23:36PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Latest binutils release (2.29.1) will no longer allow proper computation
> of GDT entries on 32-bits, with warning:
>
> arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S: Assembler messages:
> arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S:150: Warning: shift count out of range (32 is not between 0 and 31)
> arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S:150: Warning: shift count out of range (40 is not between 0 and 31)
> arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S:150: Warning: shift count out of range (32 is not between 0 and 31)
> arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S:152: Warning: shift count out of range (32 is not between 0 and 31)
> arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S:152: Warning: shift count out of range (40 is not between 0 and 31)
> arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S:152: Warning: shift count out of range (32 is not between 0 and 31)
>
> Use explicit value of the entry instead of using GDT_ENTRY() macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S b/arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S
> index e1a5fbe..934f7d4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S
> @@ -145,11 +145,11 @@ gdt_start:
> .quad 0x0000000000000000 /* NULL descriptor */
> .quad 0x0000000000000000 /* reserved */
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> - .quad GDT_ENTRY(0xa09a, 0, 0xfffff) /* __KERNEL_CS */
> + .quad 0x00af9a000000ffff /* __BOOT_CS */
> #else
> - .quad GDT_ENTRY(0xc09a, 0, 0xfffff) /* __KERNEL_CS */
> + .quad 0x00cf9a000000ffff /* __BOOT_CS */
Maybe it would be cleaner to use something like:
.word 0xffff /* limit */
.word 0 /* base */
.byte 0 /* base */
.byte 0x9a /* access */
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
.byte 0xaf /* flags plus limit */
#else
.byte 0xcf /* flags plus limit */
#endif
.byte 0 /* base */
Or try to fix the GDT_ENTRY macro, maybe if you prepend extra 0's to
make the values 64bit that would prevent the warnings?
Or declare the GDT in enlighten_pvh in C and use it here?
Also, IIRC the base/limit values are ignored in long mode.
Thanks, Roger.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists