linux-kernel - Re: Hashed pointer issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Apr 2018 17:01:04 +0000
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        tcharding <me@...in.cc>
Subject: Re: Hashed pointer issues

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 9:57 AM Linus Torvalds <
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> Although in *practice* we'd have tons of entropy on any modern development
> CPU too, since any new hardware will have the hardware random number
> generation. Some overly cautious person might not trust it, of course.

In fact, maybe that's the right policy. Avoid a boot-time parameter by just
saying

  "if you have hardware random number generation, we can fill entropy
immediately"

No kernel command line needed in practice any more. That's assuming any
kernel developer will have an IvyBridge or newer.

The "I don't trust my hardware" people can still disable that with
"nordrand".

Hmm?

                    Linus