lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180430194251.GB12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Mon, 30 Apr 2018 21:42:51 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: make CFS bandwidth slice per cpu group

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 12:29:25PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> Currently, the sched_cfs_bandwidth_slice_us is a global setting which
> affects all cgroups. Different groups may want different values based
> on their own workload, one size doesn't fit all. The global pool filled
> periodically is per cgroup too, they should have the right to distribute
> their own quota to each local CPU with their own frequency.

Why.. what happens? This doesn't really tell us anything.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ