lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d4534417-0fc0-5e38-ab80-2ffc9cfee2fa@amd.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Apr 2018 14:57:58 -0500
From:   Gary R Hook <gary.hook@....com>
To:     "Hook, Gary" <ghook@....com>,
        "Mehta, Sohil" <sohil.mehta@...el.com>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] iommu/amd: Add basic debugfs infrastructure for
 AMD IOMMU

On 04/17/2018 12:38 PM, Hook, Gary wrote:
> On 4/13/2018 8:08 PM, Mehta, Sohil wrote:
>> On Fri, 2018-04-06 at 08:17 -0500, Gary R Hook wrote:
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +    mutex_lock(&amd_iommu_debugfs_lock);
>>> +    if (!amd_iommu_debugfs) {
>>> +        d_top = iommu_debugfs_setup();
>>> +        if (d_top)
>>> +            amd_iommu_debugfs =
>>> debugfs_create_dir("amd", d_top);
>>> +    }
>>> +    mutex_unlock(&amd_iommu_debugfs_lock);
>>
>>
>> You can do the above only once if you iterate over the IOMMUs here
>>   instead of doing it in amd_iommu_init.
> 
> I'm not sure it matters, given the finite number of IOMMUs in a system, 
> and the fact that this work is done exactly once. However, removal of a 
> lock is fine thing, so I'll move this around.

After thinking about this, and looking at the code, I've decided to 
leave this alone.

v4 is on its way.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ