linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 5/9] iommu/vt-d: Per domain pasid table interfaces

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 1 May 2018 09:22:11 +0000
From:   "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
To:     Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
CC:     "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        "Kumar, Sanjay K" <sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com>,
        "Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
        "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        "Sun, Yi Y" <yi.y.sun@...el.com>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 5/9] iommu/vt-d: Per domain pasid table interfaces

> From: Lu Baolu [mailto:baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 11:03 AM
> 
> This patch adds the interfaces for per domain pasid table
> management. Currently we allocate one pasid table for all
> devices under the scope of an IOMMU. It's insecure in the
> cases where multiple devices under one single IOMMU unit
> support PASID feature. With per domain pasid table, we can
> achieve finer protection and isolation granularity.
> 
> Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
> Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>
> Cc: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
> Suggested-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c | 75
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.h |  4 +++
>  include/linux/intel-iommu.h |  5 +++
>  3 files changed, 84 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c
> index 0690f39..b8691a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>  #include <linux/intel-iommu.h>
>  #include <linux/iommu.h>
>  #include <linux/memory.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> 
>  #include "intel-pasid.h"
> @@ -58,3 +59,77 @@ void *intel_pasid_lookup_id(int pasid)
> 
>  	return p;
>  }
> +
> +/*
> + * Interfaces for per domain pasid table management:
> + */
> +int intel_pasid_alloc_table(struct device *dev, size_t entry_size,
> +			    size_t entry_count)
> +{
> +	struct device_domain_info *info;
> +	struct dmar_domain *domain;
> +	struct page *pages;
> +	int order;
> +
> +	info = dev->archdata.iommu;
> +	if (WARN_ON(!info || !dev_is_pci(dev) ||
> +		    !info->pasid_supported ||
> +		    !info->domain))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	domain = info->domain;
> +
> +	if (entry_count > intel_pasid_max_id)
> +		entry_count = intel_pasid_max_id;
> +
> +	order = get_order(entry_size * entry_count);
> +	pages = alloc_pages_node(domain->nid, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, order);
> +	if (!pages)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&pasid_lock);
> +	if (domain->pasid_table) {

Can the check be moved prior to the page allocation?

> +		__free_pages(pages, order);
> +	} else {
> +		domain->pasid_table	= page_address(pages);
> +		domain->order		= order;
> +		domain->max_pasid	= entry_count;
> +	}
> +	domain->pasid_users++;
> +	spin_unlock(&pasid_lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void intel_pasid_free_table(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct dmar_domain *domain;
> +
> +	domain = get_valid_domain_for_dev(dev);
> +	if (!domain || !dev_is_pci(dev))
> +		return;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&pasid_lock);
> +	if (domain->pasid_table) {
> +		domain->pasid_users--;
> +		if (!domain->pasid_users) {
> +			free_pages((unsigned long)domain->pasid_table,
> +				   domain->order);
> +			domain->pasid_table	= NULL;
> +			domain->order		= 0;
> +			domain->max_pasid	= 0;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock(&pasid_lock);
> +}
> +
> +void *intel_pasid_get_table(struct device *dev)

Will intel_iommu_get_pasid_table() more accurate?

Regards,
Yi Liu

> +{
> +	struct dmar_domain *domain;
> +
> +	domain = get_valid_domain_for_dev(dev);
> +	if (!domain)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	return domain->pasid_table;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.h b/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.h
> index 0c36af0..a90c60b 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.h
> @@ -26,5 +26,9 @@ extern u32 intel_pasid_max_id;
>  int intel_pasid_alloc_id(void *ptr, int start, int end, gfp_t gfp);
>  void intel_pasid_free_id(int pasid);
>  void *intel_pasid_lookup_id(int pasid);
> +int intel_pasid_alloc_table(struct device *dev, size_t entry_size,
> +			    size_t entry_count);
> +void intel_pasid_free_table(struct device *dev);
> +void *intel_pasid_get_table(struct device *dev);
> 
>  #endif /* __INTEL_PASID_H */
> diff --git a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> index a4463f0..bee7a3f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> @@ -424,6 +424,11 @@ struct dmar_domain {
>  					 */
>  	u64		max_addr;	/* maximum mapped address */
> 
> +	void		*pasid_table;	/* pointer of pasid table */
> +	unsigned int	pasid_users;	/* User number of pasid table */
> +	int		order;		/* the page order of tables */
> +	int		max_pasid;	/* max pasid */
> +
>  	struct iommu_domain domain;	/*
>  					 * generic domain data structure for
>  					 * iommu core
> --
> 2.7.4