[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1525136135.11756.94.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 20:55:35 -0400
From: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with the rdma-fixes
tree
On Tue, 2018-05-01 at 10:10 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 9fd4350ba895 ("B/rxe: avoid double kfree_skb")
>
> from the rdma-fixes tree and commit:
>
> 2e47350789eb ("IB/rxe: optimize the function duplicate_request")
>
> from the rdma tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
We will probably merge the for-rc branch into the for-next branch in the
next few days, at which point we will do the conflict resolution
ourselves and your need to carry anything should drop out.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists