[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180501100623.7ebec465@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 10:06:23 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zilstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Glexiner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Fenguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Baohong Liu <baohong.liu@...el.com>,
Vedang Patel <vedang.patel@...el.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v5 3/6] srcu: Add notrace variant of
srcu_dereference
On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 18:42:01 -0700
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com> wrote:
> In this series, we are making lockdep use an rcuidle tracepoint. For
> this reason we need a notrace variant of srcu_dereference since
> otherwise we get lockdep splats since lockdep hooks may not have run
> yet. This patch adds the needed variant.
This change log is rather confusing. Why would lockdep use an rcuidle
tracepoint? I think we need to explain more here.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists