[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ab8357f0-61d5-2996-46ca-5bc5d3e097cf@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 15:46:22 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com,
hanjun.guo@...aro.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, Will.Deacon@....com,
Catalin.Marinas@....com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
Mark.Rutland@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com,
vkilari@...eaurora.org, ahs3@...hat.com, Dietmar.Eggemann@....com,
Morten.Rasmussen@....com, palmer@...ive.com, lenb@...nel.org,
john.garry@...wei.com, austinwc@...eaurora.org,
tnowicki@...iumnetworks.com, jhugo@....qualcomm.com,
timur@....qualcomm.com, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 11/13] arm64: topology: enable ACPI/PPTT based CPU
topology
On 26/04/18 00:31, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Propagate the topology information from the PPTT tree to the
> cpu_topology array. We can get the thread id and core_id by assuming
> certain levels of the PPTT tree correspond to those concepts.
> The package_id is flagged in the tree and can be found by calling
> find_acpi_cpu_topology_package() which terminates
> its search when it finds an ACPI node flagged as the physical
> package. If the tree doesn't contain enough levels to represent
> all of the requested levels then the root node will be returned
> for all subsequent levels.
>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
[..]
> @@ -304,6 +345,8 @@ void __init init_cpu_topology(void)
> * Discard anything that was parsed if we hit an error so we
> * don't use partial information.
> */
> - if (of_have_populated_dt() && parse_dt_topology())
> + if ((!acpi_disabled) && parse_acpi_topology())
[nit] not sure if extra () is need above, but I am fine either way.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists