linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/44] 4.4.131-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180501150300.GF14123@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 1 May 2018 08:03:00 -0700
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/44] 4.4.131-stable review

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 04:55:04PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 12:24:11PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.131 release.
> > There are 44 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed May  2 19:09:34 UTC 2018.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.131-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> > 
> 
> Merged, compiled, and installed onto my Pixel 2 XL and OnePlus 5.
> 
> No build warnings from GCC 4.9.4, GCC 7.3.0, and Clang 5 through 7.
> 
> No initial issues in dmesg or general usage.

Thanks for testing the two of these and letting me know.

greg k-h