linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/10] staging: lustre: lu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <A3CD6D51-5ADF-41A0-AED2-B1C06935586C@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 1 May 2018 04:19:54 +0000
From:   "Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
To:     NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
CC:     "Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>,
        "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] staging: lustre: lu_object: discard extra lru
 count.

On Apr 30, 2018, at 21:52, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com> wrote:
> 
> lu_object maintains 2 lru counts.
> One is a per-bucket lsb_lru_len.
> The other is the per-cpu ls_lru_len_counter.
> 
> The only times the per-bucket counters are use are:
> - a debug message when an object is added
> - in lu_site_stats_get when all the counters are combined.
> 
> The debug message is not essential, and the per-cpu counter
> can be used to get the combined total.
> 
> So discard the per-bucket lsb_lru_len.
> 
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>

Looks reasonable, though it would also be possible to fix the percpu
functions rather than adding a workaround in this code.

Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...ger.ca>

> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c |   24 ++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c
> index 2a8a25d6edb5..2bf089817157 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c
> @@ -57,10 +57,6 @@
> #include <linux/list.h>
> 
> struct lu_site_bkt_data {
> -	/**
> -	 * number of object in this bucket on the lsb_lru list.
> -	 */
> -	long			lsb_lru_len;
> 	/**
> 	 * LRU list, updated on each access to object. Protected by
> 	 * bucket lock of lu_site::ls_obj_hash.
> @@ -187,10 +183,9 @@ void lu_object_put(const struct lu_env *env, struct lu_object *o)
> 	if (!lu_object_is_dying(top)) {
> 		LASSERT(list_empty(&top->loh_lru));
> 		list_add_tail(&top->loh_lru, &bkt->lsb_lru);
> -		bkt->lsb_lru_len++;
> 		percpu_counter_inc(&site->ls_lru_len_counter);
> -		CDEBUG(D_INODE, "Add %p to site lru. hash: %p, bkt: %p, lru_len: %ld\n",
> -		       o, site->ls_obj_hash, bkt, bkt->lsb_lru_len);
> +		CDEBUG(D_INODE, "Add %p to site lru. hash: %p, bkt: %p\n",
> +		       o, site->ls_obj_hash, bkt);
> 		cfs_hash_bd_unlock(site->ls_obj_hash, &bd, 1);
> 		return;
> 	}
> @@ -238,7 +233,6 @@ void lu_object_unhash(const struct lu_env *env, struct lu_object *o)
> 
> 			list_del_init(&top->loh_lru);
> 			bkt = cfs_hash_bd_extra_get(obj_hash, &bd);
> -			bkt->lsb_lru_len--;
> 			percpu_counter_dec(&site->ls_lru_len_counter);
> 		}
> 		cfs_hash_bd_del_locked(obj_hash, &bd, &top->loh_hash);
> @@ -422,7 +416,6 @@ int lu_site_purge_objects(const struct lu_env *env, struct lu_site *s,
> 			cfs_hash_bd_del_locked(s->ls_obj_hash,
> 					       &bd2, &h->loh_hash);
> 			list_move(&h->loh_lru, &dispose);
> -			bkt->lsb_lru_len--;
> 			percpu_counter_dec(&s->ls_lru_len_counter);
> 			if (did_sth == 0)
> 				did_sth = 1;
> @@ -621,7 +614,6 @@ static struct lu_object *htable_lookup(struct lu_site *s,
> 		lprocfs_counter_incr(s->ls_stats, LU_SS_CACHE_HIT);
> 		if (!list_empty(&h->loh_lru)) {
> 			list_del_init(&h->loh_lru);
> -			bkt->lsb_lru_len--;
> 			percpu_counter_dec(&s->ls_lru_len_counter);
> 		}
> 		return lu_object_top(h);
> @@ -1834,19 +1826,21 @@ struct lu_site_stats {
> 	unsigned int	lss_busy;
> };
> 
> -static void lu_site_stats_get(struct cfs_hash *hs,
> +static void lu_site_stats_get(const struct lu_site *s,
> 			      struct lu_site_stats *stats, int populated)
> {
> +	struct cfs_hash *hs = s->ls_obj_hash;
> 	struct cfs_hash_bd bd;
> 	unsigned int i;
> +	/* percpu_counter_read_positive() won't accept a const pointer */
> +	struct lu_site *s2 = (struct lu_site *)s;

It would seem worthwhile to change the percpu_counter_read_positive() and
percpu_counter_read() arguments to be "const struct percpu_counter *fbc",
rather than doing this cast here.  I can't see any reason that would be bad,
since both implementations just access fbc->count, and do not modify anything.

> +	stats->lss_busy += cfs_hash_size_get(hs) -
> +		percpu_counter_read_positive(&s2->ls_lru_len_counter);
> 	cfs_hash_for_each_bucket(hs, &bd, i) {
> -		struct lu_site_bkt_data *bkt = cfs_hash_bd_extra_get(hs, &bd);
> 		struct hlist_head	*hhead;
> 
> 		cfs_hash_bd_lock(hs, &bd, 1);
> -		stats->lss_busy  +=
> -			cfs_hash_bd_count_get(&bd) - bkt->lsb_lru_len;
> 		stats->lss_total += cfs_hash_bd_count_get(&bd);
> 		stats->lss_max_search = max((int)stats->lss_max_search,
> 					    cfs_hash_bd_depmax_get(&bd));
> @@ -2039,7 +2033,7 @@ int lu_site_stats_print(const struct lu_site *s, struct seq_file *m)
> 	struct lu_site_stats stats;
> 
> 	memset(&stats, 0, sizeof(stats));
> -	lu_site_stats_get(s->ls_obj_hash, &stats, 1);
> +	lu_site_stats_get(s, &stats, 1);
> 
> 	seq_printf(m, "%d/%d %d/%ld %d %d %d %d %d %d %d\n",
> 		   stats.lss_busy,
> 
> 

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Principal Architect
Intel Corporation