linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] regulator: add dummy of_find_regulator_by

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 2 May 2018 05:40:36 +0900
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     changbin.du@...el.com
Cc:     yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, michal.lkml@...kovi.net,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        x86@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, arnd@...db.de,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] regulator: add dummy of_find_regulator_by_node

On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 09:00:11PM +0800, changbin.du@...el.com wrote:
> From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@...el.com>
> 
> If device tree is not enabled, of_find_regulator_by_node() should have
> a dummy function since the function call is still there.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@...el.com>

This appears to have no obvious connection with the cover letter for the
series...  The first question here is if this is something best fixed
with a stub or by fixing the users - is the lack of a stub pointing out
some bugs in them?  I'm a bit worried about how we've been managing to
avoid any build test issues here though, surely the various builders
would have spotted a problem?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)