lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180502215950.GA4621@sudip-laptop>
Date:   Wed, 2 May 2018 22:59:50 +0100
From:   Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] libata: blacklist Micron SSD

Hi Martin,

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 11:24:49PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> 
> Sudip,
> 
> > v1: Only M500IT MU01 was blacklisted.
> >
> > v2: Whitelist M500IT BG02 and M500DC and then blacklist all other Micron. 
> 
> I think my preference would be to blacklist M500IT with the MU01
> firmware (which Micron said was affected) and rely on the "Micron*"
> fallthrough further down for the rest.

This patch was based on your reply at:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ide/msg55370.html

> 
> I have not gotten firm confirmation on ZRAT behavior so for now we
> should probably just do:
> 
> + { "Micron_M500IT_*", "MU01",	ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM, },

My v1 patch had only MU01 with ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM and
ATA_HORKAGE_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM. I am not very much confident on only
having ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM as we have seen huge regression due to
243918be6393 ("libata: Do not blacklist Micron M500DC"). Unless, Micron
confirms that it can only have 'ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM' I think we
should go for both. I don't think we should mark it as ZRAT supported,
(without Micron confirmation) and cause another regression.
My v1 patch is at https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10287605/
Do you want me to resend it again?

--
Regards
Sudip

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ