linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "dmaengine: pl330: add DMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180502043230.GQ6014@localhost>
Date:   Wed, 2 May 2018 10:02:30 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To:     Frank Mori Hess <fmh6jj@...il.com>
Cc:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        r.baldyga@...kerion.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "dmaengine: pl330: add DMA_PAUSE feature"

On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 05:50:58PM -0400, Frank Mori Hess wrote:
> This reverts commit 88987d2c7534a0269f567fb101e6d71a08f0f01d.
> 
> The pl330.c pause implementation violates the dmaengine requirement
> for no data loss, since it relies on the DMAKILL
> instruction.  However, DMAKILL discards in-flight data from the
> dma controller's fifo.  This is documented in the dma-330 manual
> and I have observed it with hardware doing device-to-memory burst
> transfers.  The discarded data may or may not show up in the
> residue count, depending on timing (resulting in data corruption
> effectively).

I am dropping the orignal patch for queue, so no need for revert patch.

-- 
~Vinod