lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180502005604.GJ10479@thunk.org>
Date:   Tue, 1 May 2018 20:56:04 -0400
From:   "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     Sultan Alsawaf <sultanxda@...il.com>
Cc:     Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
        Jeremy Cline <jeremy@...ine.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Linux messages full of `random: get_random_u32 called from`

On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 05:43:17PM -0700, Sultan Alsawaf wrote:
> 
> I've attached what I think is a reasonable stopgap solution until this is
> actually fixed. If you're willing to revert the CVE-2018-1108 patches
> completely, then I don't think you'll mind using this patch in the meantime.

I would put it slightly differently; reverting the CVE-2018-1108
patches is less dangerous than what you are proposing in your attached
patch.

Again, I think the right answer is to fix userspace to not require
cryptographic grade entropy during early system startup, and for
people to *think* about what they are doing.  I've looked at the
systemd's use of hmac in journal-authenticate, and as near as I can
tell, there isn't any kind of explanation about why it was necessary,
or what threat it was trying to protect against.

						- Ted

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ