[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000001d3e1e5$39b15640$ad1402c0$@zhaoxin.com>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 15:14:35 +0800
From: David Wang <davidwang@...oxin.com>
To: 'Thomas Gleixner' <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: <mingo@...hat.com>, <hpa@...or.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<brucechang@...-alliance.com>, <cooperyan@...oxin.com>,
<qiyuanwang@...oxin.com>, <benjaminpan@...tech.com>,
<lukelin@...cpu.com>, <timguo@...oxin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] report correct CPU/cache topology
> -----Original Mail-----
> Sender: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:tglx@...utronix.de]
> Time: 2018年4月26日 19:56
> Receiver: David Wang <davidwang@...oxin.com>
> CC: mingo@...hat.com; hpa@...or.com; gregkh@...uxfoundation.org;
> x86@...nel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; brucechang@...-
> alliance.com; cooperyan@...oxin.com; qiyuanwang@...oxin.com;
> benjaminpan@...tech.com; lukelin@...cpu.com; timguo@...oxin.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] report correct CPU/cache topology
>
>
>
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2018, David Wang wrote:
>
> > Centaur CPUs enumerate the cache topology in the same way as Intel
> > CPUs, but the function is unused so far.
> > The Centaur init code also misses to initialize x86_info::max_cores,
> > so the CPU topology can't be described correctly.
> >
> > Initialize x86_info::max_cores and invoke init_intel_cachinfo() to
> > make CPU and cache topology information avaliable and correct
>
> Now that looks pretty good.
>
> > Signed-off-by: David Wang <davidwang@...oxin.com>
> >
> > Changes from v2 to v3:
> > *1 define new detect_num_cpu_cores() in common.c to replace the
> > original intel_num_cpu_cores;
> > *2 move cpu_detect_cache_sizes inside init_intel_cacheinfo.
>
> But I asked for that being a separate patch with a separate changelog. And
> the intel_cache_info() change wants to be in a separate patch as well.
Then
> the third patch is the one which makes use of these changes for centaur.
>
> Please read review comments carefully and rather ask when you have
> doubts about the meaning.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
Sorry!
I will split the changes to three separate patches.
Thank you.
---
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists