[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <786ca83f-45c4-264b-2aef-d84fb18d3d28@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 11:49:58 +0200
From: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>
To: Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: Fix inversed DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN test
Am 01.05.2018 um 15:24 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
> From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@....com>
>
> The result was printing the warning only when we were explicitly asked
> not to.
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Fixes: 0176adb004065d6815a8e67946752df4cd947c5b "swiotlb: refactor
> coherent buffer allocation"
> Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@....com>
Good catch, looked at the code multiple times and haven't seen that
myself :)
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>.
Christian.
> ---
> lib/swiotlb.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c
> index c43ec2271469..e9ac21540628 100644
> --- a/lib/swiotlb.c
> +++ b/lib/swiotlb.c
> @@ -750,7 +750,7 @@ swiotlb_alloc_buffer(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma_handle,
> swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(dev, phys_addr, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE,
> DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
> out_warn:
> - if ((attrs & DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN) && printk_ratelimit()) {
> + if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN) && printk_ratelimit()) {
> dev_warn(dev,
> "swiotlb: coherent allocation failed, size=%zu\n",
> size);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists