linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] mm: introduce memory.min

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180502123040.GA16060@cmpxchg.org>
Date:   Wed, 2 May 2018 08:30:40 -0400
From:   Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To:     Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: introduce memory.min

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 01:36:10PM +0100, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> @@ -59,6 +59,12 @@ enum memcg_memory_event {
>  	MEMCG_NR_MEMORY_EVENTS,
>  };
>  
> +enum mem_cgroup_protection {
> +	MEMCG_PROT_NONE,
> +	MEMCG_PROT_LOW,
> +	MEMCG_PROT_HIGH,

Ha, HIGH doesn't make much sense, but I went back and it's indeed what
I suggested. Must have been a brainfart. This should be

MEMCG_PROT_NONE,
MEMCG_PROT_LOW,
MEMCG_PROT_MIN

right? To indicate which type of protection is applying.

The rest of the patch looks good:

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>