[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1805021425040.1560@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 14:30:17 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Dongsong Yu <yudongsong1992@...il.com>
cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, syzkaller@...glegroups.com,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: Use-after-scope Read in tick_sched_handle' bug.
On Wed, 2 May 2018, Dongsong Yu wrote:
CC+ ARM64 folks which should have been cc'ed in the first place.
> Hi,
> I've got the following bug report while fuzzing linux kenrel (4.16.0) on
> arm64 with syzkaller.
> The kernel config file and poc generated by C reproducer are attached.
>
> Syzkaller hit 'KASAN: use-after-scope Read in tick_sched_handle' bug.
>
>
> ==================================================================
> BUG: KASAN: use-after-scope in tick_sched_handle.isra.5+0x64/0xa8
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c:162
> Read of size 8 at addr ffff800073866578 by task syzkaller195252/1474
>
> CPU: 0 PID: 1474 Comm: syzkaller195252 Not tainted 4.16.0 #2
> Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> Call trace:
> dump_backtrace+0x0/0x350 arch/arm64/kernel/time.c:64
> show_stack+0x20/0x30 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:151
> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:17 [inline]
> dump_stack+0x11c/0x198 lib/dump_stack.c:53
> print_address_description+0x60/0x270 mm/kasan/report.c:256
> kasan_report_error mm/kasan/report.c:354 [inline]
> kasan_report+0x248/0x348 mm/kasan/report.c:412
> check_memory_region_inline mm/kasan/kasan.c:260 [inline]
> __asan_load8+0x84/0xa8 mm/kasan/kasan.c:698
> tick_sched_handle.isra.5+0x64/0xa8 kernel/time/tick-sched.c:162
So on 4.16.0 this is:
139 static void tick_sched_handle(struct tick_sched *ts, struct pt_regs *regs)
140 {
141 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
142 /*
143 * When we are idle and the tick is stopped, we have to touch
144 * the watchdog as we might not schedule for a really long
145 * time. This happens on complete idle SMP systems while
146 * waiting on the login prompt. We also increment the "start of
147 * idle" jiffy stamp so the idle accounting adjustment we do
148 * when we go busy again does not account too much ticks.
149 */
150 if (ts->tick_stopped) {
151 touch_softlockup_watchdog_sched();
152 if (is_idle_task(current))
153 ts->idle_jiffies++;
154 /*
155 * In case the current tick fired too early past its expected
156 * expiration, make sure we don't bypass the next clock reprogramming
157 * to the same deadline.
158 */
159 ts->next_tick = 0;
160 }
161 #endif
162 update_process_times(user_mode(regs));
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
163 profile_tick(CPU_PROFILING);
164 }
165 #endif
Confused to be honest.
> tick_sched_timer+0x50/0xe0 kernel/time/tick-sched.c:1194
> __run_hrtimer kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1349 [inline]
> __hrtimer_run_queues+0x1dc/0x2c0 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1411
> hrtimer_interrupt+0x180/0x390 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1469
> timer_handler drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c:588 [inline]
> arch_timer_handler_virt+0x44/0x70 drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c:599
> handle_percpu_devid_irq+0xdc/0x1e8 kernel/irq/chip.c:896
> generic_handle_irq_desc include/linux/irqdesc.h:159 [inline]
> generic_handle_irq+0x48/0x68 kernel/irq/irqdesc.c:606
> __handle_domain_irq+0x8c/0x108 kernel/irq/irqdesc.c:643
> handle_domain_irq include/linux/irqdesc.h:177 [inline]
> gic_handle_irq+0x6c/0xd8 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c:367
> el1_irq+0xb0/0x128 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:602
> prep_new_page mm/page_alloc.c:1816 [inline]
> get_page_from_freelist+0x628/0x1998 mm/page_alloc.c:3239
> __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x244/0x1600 mm/page_alloc.c:4245
> alloc_pages_current+0x128/0x1f0 mm/mempolicy.c:2055
> alloc_pages include/linux/gfp.h:492 [inline]
> pte_alloc_one arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h:104 [inline]
> __pte_alloc+0x8c/0x200 mm/memory.c:654
> do_anonymous_page+0x844/0x9b0 mm/memory.c:3141
> handle_pte_fault mm/memory.c:3977 [inline]
> __handle_mm_fault+0xb94/0x1528 mm/memory.c:4103
> handle_mm_fault+0x288/0x3e0 mm/memory.c:4140
> __do_page_fault arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:377 [inline]
> do_page_fault+0x398/0x630 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:459
> do_translation_fault+0x90/0xb0 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:561
> do_mem_abort+0xbc/0x208 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:698
> el0_da+0x20/0x24
>
> The buggy address belongs to the page:
> page:ffff7e0001ce1980 count:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0
> flags: 0x4fffc00000000000()
> raw: 4fffc00000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff
> raw: ffff7e0001ce19a0 ffff7e0001ce19a0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
>
> Memory state around the buggy address:
> ffff800073866400: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> ffff800073866480: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8
> >ffff800073866500: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8
> ^
> ffff800073866580: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8
> ffff800073866600: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> ==================================================================
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists