[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4F016FCD-04B0-4EE1-A9F4-5A182DD437EF@goldelico.com>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 14:35:24 +0200
From: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Discussions about the Letux Kernel
<letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org>, kernel@...a-handheld.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/7] gpio: pca953x: fix address calculation for pcal6524
Hi Andy,
> Am 02.05.2018 um 14:28 schrieb Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>:
>
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 7:31 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com> wrote:
>> The register constants are so far defined in a way that they fit
>> for the pcal9555a when shifted by the number of banks, i.e. are
>> multiplied by 2 in the accessor function.
>>
>> Now, the pcal6524 has 3 banks which means the relative offset
>> is multiplied by 4 for the standard registers.
>>
>> Simply applying the bit shift to the extended registers gives
>> a wrong result, since the base offset is already included in
>> the offset.
>>
>> Therefore, we add code to the 24 bit accessor functions to
>> adjust the register number for these exended registers.
>>
>
> Suggested-by ?
Detecting that we need to adjust the registers generally was from me,
but your suggestion of an improved formula should of course be mentioned
and appreciated!
I'll think about a good formulation for v6.
BR and thanks,
Nikolaus
>
>> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
>> index fc863faa3ce4..4194495a7990 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
>> @@ -221,9 +221,11 @@ static int pca957x_write_regs_16(struct pca953x_chip *chip, int reg, u8 *val)
>> static int pca953x_write_regs_24(struct pca953x_chip *chip, int reg, u8 *val)
>> {
>> int bank_shift = fls((chip->gpio_chip.ngpio - 1) / BANK_SZ);
>> + int addr = (reg & PCAL_GPIO_MASK) << bank_shift;
>> + int pinctrl = (reg & PCAL_PINCTRL_MASK) << 1;
>>
>> return i2c_smbus_write_i2c_block_data(chip->client,
>> - (reg << bank_shift) | REG_ADDR_AI,
>> + pinctrl | addr | REG_ADDR_AI,
>> NBANK(chip), val);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -263,9 +265,11 @@ static int pca953x_read_regs_16(struct pca953x_chip *chip, int reg, u8 *val)
>> static int pca953x_read_regs_24(struct pca953x_chip *chip, int reg, u8 *val)
>> {
>> int bank_shift = fls((chip->gpio_chip.ngpio - 1) / BANK_SZ);
>> + int addr = (reg & PCAL_GPIO_MASK) << bank_shift;
>> + int pinctrl = (reg & PCAL_PINCTRL_MASK) << 1;
>>
>> return i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(chip->client,
>> - (reg << bank_shift) | REG_ADDR_AI,
>> + pinctrl | addr | REG_ADDR_AI,
>> NBANK(chip), val);
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.12.2
>>
>
>
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists