[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180502133832.GA18204@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 09:38:32 -0400
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: introduce memory.min
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 02:54:15PM +0100, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> From: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 14:44:14 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] mm: ignore memory.min of abandoned memory cgroups
>
> If a cgroup has no associated tasks, invoking the OOM killer
> won't help release any memory, so respecting the memory.min
> can lead to an infinite OOM loop or system stall.
>
> Let's ignore memory.min of unpopulated cgroups.
Good point, this makes sense.
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> @@ -2549,8 +2549,11 @@ static bool shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
> /*
> * Hard protection.
> * If there is no reclaimable memory, OOM.
> + * Abandoned cgroups are loosing protection,
losing
Powered by blists - more mailing lists