linux-kernel - [PATCH 05/52] perf stat: Display time in precision based on std deviation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180502151942.20542-6-acme@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed,  2 May 2018 12:18:55 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/52] perf stat: Display time in precision based on std deviation

From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>

Ingo suggested to display elapsed time for multirun workload (perf stat
-e) with precision based on the precision of the standard deviation.

In his own words:

  > This output is a slightly bit misleading:

  >  Performance counter stats for 'make -j128' (10 runs):
  >      27.988995256 seconds time elapsed                  ( +-  0.39% )

  > The 9 significant digits in the result, while only 1 is valid, suggests accuracy
  > where none exists.

  > It would be better if 'perf stat' would display elapsed time with a precision
  > adjusted to stddev, it should display at most 2 more significant digits than
  > the stddev inaccuracy.

  > I.e. in the above case 0.39% is 0.109, so we only have accuracy for 1 digit, and
  > so we should only display 3:

  >        27.988 seconds time elapsed                       ( +-  0.39% )

Plus a suggestion about the output, which is small enough and connected
with the above change that I merged both changes together.

  > Small output style nit - I think it would be nice if with --repeat the stddev was
  > also displayed in absolute values, besides percentage:
  >
  >       27.988 +- 0.109 seconds time elapsed   ( +- 0.39% )

The output is now:

   Performance counter stats for './perf bench sched pipe' (5 runs):
   SNIP
           13.3667 +- 0.0256 seconds time elapsed  ( +-  0.19% )

Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180423090823.32309-7-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
index f17dc601b0f3..3a94647ef6bc 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
@@ -1764,19 +1764,37 @@ static void print_header(int argc, const char **argv)
 	}
 }
 
+static int get_precision(double num)
+{
+	if (num > 1)
+		return 0;
+
+	return lround(ceil(-log10(num)));
+}
+
 static void print_footer(void)
 {
+	double avg = avg_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats) / NSEC_PER_SEC;
 	FILE *output = stat_config.output;
 	int n;
 
 	if (!null_run)
 		fprintf(output, "\n");
-	fprintf(output, " %17.9f seconds time elapsed",
-			avg_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats) / NSEC_PER_SEC);
-	if (run_count > 1) {
-		fprintf(output, "                                        ");
-		print_noise_pct(stddev_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats),
-				avg_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats));
+
+	if (run_count == 1) {
+		fprintf(output, " %17.9f seconds time elapsed", avg);
+	} else {
+		double sd = stddev_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats) / NSEC_PER_SEC;
+		/*
+		 * Display at most 2 more significant
+		 * digits than the stddev inaccuracy.
+		 */
+		int precision = get_precision(sd) + 2;
+
+		fprintf(output, " %17.*f +- %.*f seconds time elapsed",
+			precision, avg, precision, sd);
+
+		print_noise_pct(sd, avg);
 	}
 	fprintf(output, "\n\n");
 
-- 
2.14.3