linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: fix incorrect entry in omap5430_adc_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 02 May 2018 18:20:59 +0200
From:   Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>, Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: fix incorrect entry in
 omap5430_adc_to_temp[]

On Wednesday, May 02, 2018 05:49:31 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 04:14:32PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Entry for Index 941 has one zero too much. Fix it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
> 
> Good catch :)

Thanks. :)

> I'm curious, how did you spot it ?

While I was reading the driver code I've noticed that
omap5430_adc_to_temp[] and dra752_adc_to_temp[] look pretty
similar so I've diff-ed them to find the actual differences
(+ to see if one of the tables can be removed). One of such
differences was the line containing the incorrect entry.

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics